Huananzhi X79

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics49.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardHuananzhi X79  (all builds)
Memory28.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit, ,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 07 '21 at 10:22
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1650 0-$230
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
85% Excellent
Memory 93.3
1-Core 104
2-Core 207
78% 135 Pts
4-Core 413
8-Core 648
65% 531 Pts
64-Core 783
48% 783 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 85%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 290X-$549
Sapphire(174B E282) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1030 MHz, MLim: 1325 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.8% Average
Lighting 63.6
Reflection 68.4
Parallax 89.9
52% 74 fps
MRender 64.5
Gravity 63.4
Splatting 44.6
46% 57.5 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 55%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
P4-960 960GB
750GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R1217B
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 480
Write 400
Mixed 380
94% 420 MB/s
4K Read 18.9
4K Write 82.5
4K Mixed 24.3
104% 41.9 MB/s
DQ Read 153
DQ Write 317
DQ Mixed 41.6
87% 171 MB/s
Poor: 38% Great: 108%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$55
1TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,412
Write 31.2
Mixed 70.7
1,078% 1,505 MB/s
4K Read 542
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 1.9
22,821% 182 MB/s
Poor: 31% Great: 67%
WD Green 2TB (2009)-$113
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 87.3
Write 87.8
Mixed 47.7
55% 74.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.6
136% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 30% Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1K70CH0- Dimm2_Manufacturer 36JSF1G72PZ-1 M393B1K70CH0- Dimm6_Manufacturer 36JSF1G72PZ-1 32GB
1866, 1866, 1866, 1866 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
109% Outstanding
MC Read 45.8
MC Write 43.7
MC Mixed 39.9
123% 43.1 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 14.2
SC Mixed 13
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 61.4
65% 61.4 ns
Poor: 95%
This bench: 109%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79 Builds (Compare 673 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Huananzhi X79

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $158
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback