Huananzhi X79

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics54.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardHuananzhi X79  (all builds)
Memory26.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191224
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 24 '20 at 17:46
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1650 0-$230
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
83.6% Excellent
Memory 93.4
1-Core 104
2-Core 179
75% 125 Pts
4-Core 398
8-Core 635
64% 517 Pts
64-Core 789
49% 789 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 290X-$549
Sapphire(174B E282) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1030 MHz, MLim: 1325 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.20
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
54.2% Above average
Lighting 66.1
Reflection 60.4
Parallax 87.3
54% 71.3 fps
MRender 60.7
Gravity 59.3
Splatting 76.7
55% 65.6 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 55%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
P4-960 960GB
772GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R1217B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 391 411 411 409 417 412 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
85.2% Excellent
Read 471
Write 376
Mixed 337
SusWrite 409
89% 398 MB/s
4K Read 21.6
4K Write 70.7
4K Mixed 24.2
101% 38.8 MB/s
DQ Read 168
DQ Write 319
DQ Mixed 41.8
89% 176 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 108%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$55
1TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.2 0 0 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 31% Great: 67%
WD Green 2TB (2009)-$113
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 87 91 85 92 80 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
49.9% Average
Read 86.9
Write 93.8
Mixed 41.1
SusWrite 86.8
56% 77.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 60%
SanDisk Ultra 64GB
15GB free, PID 558a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 11 13 12 13 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
26.6% Poor
Read 136
Write 12.7
Mixed 27.3
SusWrite 14.2
44% 47.5 MB/s
4K Read 6.8
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1.7
107% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 26.6%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1K70CH0- Dimm2_Manufacturer 36JSF1G72PZ-1 M393B1K70CH0- Dimm6_Manufacturer 36JSF1G72PZ-1 32GB
1866, 1866, 1866, 1866 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
110% Outstanding
MC Read 46.2
MC Write 44.2
MC Mixed 40.6
125% 43.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 14.2
SC Mixed 13.4
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 61.2
65% 61.2 ns
Poor: 95%
This bench: 110%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79 Builds (Compare 673 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Huananzhi X79

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $158
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback