TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Huananzhi X79

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics55.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardHuananzhi X79  (all builds)
Memory27.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191224
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateSep 26 '20 at 18:15
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1650 0-$230
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
82.8% Excellent
Memory 91.3
1-Core 83.9
2-Core 193
71% 123 Pts
4-Core 401
8-Core 620
63% 510 Pts
64-Core 728
45% 728 Pts
Poor: 65% ↑
This bench: 82.8%
 Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 290X-$549
Sapphire(174B E282) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1030 MHz, MLim: 1325 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.20
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
55.3% Above average
Lighting 67.5
Reflection 59.4
Parallax 80.4
55% 69.1 fps
MRender 60.8
Gravity 61.9
Splatting 77.1
56% 66.6 fps
Poor: 46% ↑
This bench: 55.3%
 Great: 55%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
P4-960 960GB
754GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R1217B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 402 418 424 419 431 425 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
42.9% Average
Read 317
Write 5.5
Mixed 9.5
SusWrite 420
42% 188 MB/s
4K Read 9.1
4K Write 5.7
4K Mixed 0.4
17% 5.07 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑
This bench: 42.9%
 Great: 108%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$55
1TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.5 0 0 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 31% Great: 67%
WD Green 2TB (2009)-$113
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 95 94 93 95 95 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
53.3% Above average
Read 91.8
Write 95
Mixed 48
SusWrite 93.9
60% 82.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑
This bench: 53.3%
 Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1K70CH0- Dimm2_Manufacturer 36JSF1G72PZ-1 M393B1K70CH0- Dimm6_Manufacturer 36JSF1G72PZ-1 32GB
1866, 1866, 1866, 1866 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
105% Outstanding
MC Read 43.6
MC Write 43.3
MC Mixed 38.8
120% 41.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 10.8
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 65.3
61% 65.3 ns
Poor: 95% ↑
This bench: 105%
 Great: 110%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical X79 Builds (Compare 673 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Huananzhi X79

CPU
Xeon E5-2689 0IntelBench 71%, 6,987 samples124x
Xeon E5-2650 v2IntelBench 67%, 5,123 samples71x
Xeon E5-1650 v2Intel  $635Bench 76%, 10,921 samples67x
GPU
RX 580AMD  $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples44x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia  $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples42x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia  $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples39x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples21x
AS2280P4 256GBApacerBench 168%, 1,607 samples15x
A400 480GBKingston  $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples13x
RAM
M393B5170GB0- 4x4GBSamsungBench 89%, 2,611 samples57x
M393B1K70DH0- 4x8GBSamsungBench 91%, 1,639 samples46x
M393B1K70QB0- 4x8GBSamsungBench 96%, 634 samples25x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $158
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback