HP Laptop 17-ca1xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics10.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive142% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Laptop 17-ca1xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 85B3
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191227
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 05 '21 at 11:15
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
64.7% Good
Memory 66.6
1-Core 108
2-Core 198
69% 124 Pts
4-Core 338
8-Core 538
54% 438 Pts
64-Core 540
33% 540 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Graphics
HP(103C 85B3) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.11.3
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
10.9% Very poor
Lighting 13.9
Reflection 11.8
Parallax 19.8
11% 15.2 fps
MRender 11.1
Gravity 15.7
Splatting 10.5
10% 12.4 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 10.9%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg30zmv256g TOSHIBA 256GB
151GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ADHA0102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 493 522 534 556 545 556 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
142% Outstanding
Read 639
Write 588
Mixed 598
SusWrite 534
133% 590 MB/s
4K Read 44.1
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 57.5
195% 68 MB/s
DQ Read 647
DQ Write 405
DQ Mixed 535
396% 529 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 142%
Great: 147%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
817GB free
Firmware: 04.01A04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 113 112 113 114 113 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
74.4% Very good
Read 147
Write 115
Mixed 72.9
SusWrite 112
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.8
193% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD CT8G4SFS8266.M8FD 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
82.7% Excellent
MC Read 30.3
MC Write 32.7
MC Mixed 26.9
86% 30 GB/s
SC Read 21.6
SC Write 32.6
SC Mixed 24.2
75% 26.1 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Laptop 17-ca1xxx Builds (Compare 196 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 17-ca1xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback