Asus GL553VD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics2.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus GL553VD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GL553VD
Memory17.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190429
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJan 04 '21 at 07:19
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76.5% Very good
Memory 77.4
1-Core 112
2-Core 211
75% 133 Pts
4-Core 409
8-Core 576
62% 493 Pts
64-Core 592
37% 592 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
Asus(1043 15E0) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7325
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
2.55% Terrible
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 31.1
Parallax 8.2
0% 13.1 fps
MRender 8.1
Gravity 7.1
Splatting 10.9
7% 8.7 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.55%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SN8U128G1002 128GB
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X4131002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 99 89 90 93 88 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
63.3% Good
Read 435
Write 203
Mixed 201
SusWrite 93.8
51% 233 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 44.8
4K Mixed 24.8
90% 30.8 MB/s
DQ Read 344
DQ Write 213
DQ Mixed 204
172% 254 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 87%
Seagate ST2000LM007-1R8174 2TB
930GB free
Firmware: SDM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 108 106 106 108 105 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
43.2% Average
Read 43.5
Write 116
Mixed 65.5
SusWrite 107
61% 82.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
129% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 017A 76.D305G.D390B 24GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.5% Average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 14.2
48% 17 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 15.7
47% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 85.5
47% 85.5 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GL553VD Builds (Compare 3,991 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus GL553VD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback