MSI X370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A32)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive96.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7A32
MotherboardMSI X370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A32)  (all builds)
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190121
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 03 '21 at 10:35
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Memory 81.7
1-Core 117
2-Core 232
80% 143 Pts
4-Core 466
8-Core 848
79% 657 Pts
64-Core 1,223
76% 1,223 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS250G32TND-N1A0A 250GB
140GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 30000P10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 338 264 232 254 217 211 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
96.4% Outstanding
Read 495
Write 447
Mixed 404
SusWrite 252
90% 399 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 73.9
4K Mixed 44
145% 50.2 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 359
269% 358 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 107%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$137
33GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 352 481 354 132 130 125 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
90.7% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 460
Mixed 434
SusWrite 262
93% 415 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 84.4
4K Mixed 43.9
144% 52.3 MB/s
DQ Read 329
DQ Write 87.4
DQ Mixed 149
125% 188 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 90.7%
Great: 133%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$39
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3066 MHz clocked @ 1533 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
96.9% Outstanding
MC Read 40.4
MC Write 33.7
MC Mixed 32.6
102% 35.6 GB/s
SC Read 21.9
SC Write 34.7
SC Mixed 24.5
77% 27 GB/s
Latency 77.4
52% 77.4 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 96.9%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A32) Builds (Compare 1,834 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI X370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A32) - $155

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $684
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback