Asus P8H67-M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics27.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P8H67-M  (all builds)
Memory8.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130912
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 02 '21 at 22:12
Run Duration92 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2100-$49
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
49.2% Average
Memory 70.6
1-Core 65.8
2-Core 117
52% 84.3 Pts
4-Core 160
8-Core 176
22% 168 Pts
64-Core 170
10% 170 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 270X-$199
CLim: 1070 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.11.3
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
27.7% Poor
Lighting 35.8
Reflection 35.5
Parallax 46.4
29% 39.2 fps
MRender 32.3
Gravity 33.9
Splatting 26.3
25% 30.8 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 29%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 120GB-$15
6GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 366
Write 121
Mixed 3.7
35% 164 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 8.6
4K Mixed 0.5
11% 4.33 MB/s
DQ Read 24
DQ Write 99
DQ Mixed 0.3
18% 41.1 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905471-001.A01LF 029E CMX8GX3M2A1333C9 9905471-001.A01LF 029E CMX8GX3M2A1333C9 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.3% Average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 15.4
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 15.1
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 99.9
40% 99.9 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H67-M Builds (Compare 402 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $225
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback