Gigabyte GA-H77M-D3H

Performance Results


Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	16.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	33.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H77M-D3H (all builds)
Memory	6.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121121
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 24 '17 at 00:28
Run Duration	373 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3470-$59 223,595 User benchmarks, average bench 63% Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3470 CPU @ 3.20GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	80.3% Excellent	Memory 94.1 1-Core 102 2-Core 202 77% 133 Pts	4-Core 387 8-Core 383 52% 385 Pts	64-Core 389 24% 389 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 80.3% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120 66,662 User benchmarks, average bench 15% Gigabyte(1458 3642) 2GB CLim: 1352 MHz, MLim: 1254 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 378.78 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	16.6% Very poor	Lighting 20.4 Reflection 16.7 Parallax 17.4 17% 18.2 fps	MRender 23.9 Gravity 20.3 Splatting 17.2 16% 20.5 fps
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 16.6% Great: 16%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ AGILITY3 60GB 14,293 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 15GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 90 90 12017750 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 76 76 100502234747576 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2874 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 29 (B1) Unknown 0 0 7 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 30 128850984990 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 12017750 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 12017750 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 12017750 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 6426 (EA) Unknown 0 0 5718 (F1) Unknown 0 0 5718 (F2) Unknown 0 0 9992	33.4% Below average	Read 150 Write 66.7 Mixed 92.9 23% 103 MB/s	4K Read 17.2 4K Write 64 4K Mixed 10.5 73% 30.6 MB/s	DQ Read 24.8 DQ Write 68.6 DQ Mixed 8.93 18% 34.1 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 33.4% Great: 51%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$25 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 450GB free Firmware: 15.01H15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 11 (03) Spinup time 140 138 3991 (04) Start/Stop count 91 91 9107 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 72 72 21020 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2890 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 39 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 197 197 9067 (C2) HDA temperature 104 92 39 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	59.8% Above average	Read 99 Write 110 Mixed 32.4 59% 80.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.61 4K Write 1.63 4K Mixed 0.43 104% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 59.8% Great: 69%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 408GB free Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 112 99 45540960 (03) Spinup time 93 93 0 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6860 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 64 60 12893470466 (09) Power-on hours count 79 79 19103 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2470 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 99 99 1 (BE) vendor-specific 65 53 589365283 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 58 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 89 89 23134 (C2) HDA temperature 35 47 64424509475 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -65107409232087 (F1) Unknown 100 253 4520727292 (F2) Unknown 100 253 12392948588	90.7% Outstanding	Read 157 Write 160 Mixed 49.6 89% 122 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.21 4K Mixed 0.2 65% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 90.7% Great: 113%
SanDisk Cruzer Fit 8GB 4,577 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 3GB free, PID 5571 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	6% Terrible	Read 20.8 Write 3.34 Mixed 5.5 9% 9.88 MB/s	4K Read 4.28 4K Write 0.41 4K Mixed 1.15 69% 1.95 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 6% Great: 13%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB 78,181 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	61.1% Good	MC Read 22.3 MC Write 22.1 MC Mixed 19 60% 21.1 GB/s	SC Read 17.7 SC Write 17.7 SC Mixed 17.7 51% 17.7 GB/s	Latency 59.6 67% 59.6 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 61.1% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H77M-D3H Builds (Compare 1,276 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H77M-D3H - $99

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	350x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	168x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	124x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	96x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	95x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	70x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	60x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	41x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	23x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	35x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	12x
99U5471-020.A00LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 48%, 6,486 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $424

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16