MSI MS-16J9

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics30.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive112% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star GL62M 7REX
MotherboardMSI MS-16J9  (all builds)
Memory24.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, , 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180323
Uptime3.8 Days
Run DateDec 30 '20 at 22:09
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
66.1% Good
Memory 75.9
1-Core 81.9
2-Core 173
64% 110 Pts
4-Core 304
8-Core 562
52% 433 Pts
64-Core 548
34% 548 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)
MSI(1462 11C8) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6089
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.2% Below average
Lighting 38.6
Reflection 39.3
Parallax 37.7
32% 38.5 fps
MRender 38.5
Gravity 40.3
Splatting 26.2
28% 35 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 31%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN512HMJP-00000 512GB
289GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAV2100Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 401 234 234 242 238 239 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 494
Write 438
Mixed 398
SusWrite 264
89% 399 MB/s
4K Read 42.1
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 57.5
193% 67.9 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 350
266% 358 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 112%
Great: 125%
Seagate ST500LM021-1KJ152 500GB
91GB free
Firmware: 0003SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 96 95 95 95 97 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
55.1% Above average
Read 97.4
Write 85.1
Mixed 40
SusWrite 94.8
58% 79.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
117% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43BB1-CPB 029E CMSO16GX4M1A2133C15 32GB
2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
67.1% Good
MC Read 24.2
MC Write 26
MC Mixed 21.4
68% 23.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 26.1
SC Mixed 21.5
59% 20.8 GB/s
Latency 88.5
45% 88.5 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16J9 Builds (Compare 3,771 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16J9

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback