bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics75.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive121% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
System
MotherboardIntel DX58SO
Memory12.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130729
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateDec 28 '20 at 14:08
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5660
J1PR, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
66.9% Good
Memory 91.1
1-Core 76.3
2-Core 147
64% 105 Pts
4-Core 232
8-Core 401
38% 316 Pts
64-Core 387
24% 387 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
75.7% Very good
Lighting 93.4
Reflection 157
Parallax 96.2
76% 115 fps
MRender 96.5
Gravity 94.5
Splatting 86
75% 92.3 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 452 483 499 525 513 519 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 687
Write 496
Mixed 457
SusWrite 498
120% 535 MB/s
4K Read 32.5
4K Write 64.7
4K Mixed 44.6
141% 47.3 MB/s
DQ Read 466
DQ Write 381
DQ Mixed 418
315% 422 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 121%
Great: 353%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
224GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 87 84 87 86 86 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
64.4% Good
Read 138
Write 80.5
Mixed 89.3
SusWrite 85.8
73% 98.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
201% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 101%
Generic Flash Disk 126GB
66GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.2 7.2 7.2 7.3 7.2 7.3 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
5.11% Terrible
Read 19.7
Write 4.8
Mixed 1.7
SusWrite 7
9% 8.3 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
12% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.11%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3x8GB
3 of 4 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR3
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
43.9% Average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 17.1
45% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 7.8
SC Mixed 9.8
25% 8.77 GB/s
Latency 65.6
61% 65.6 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,293 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback