bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 40% Speed boat	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 33% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	72.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System
Motherboard	Intel DX58SO
Memory	9.4 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130729
Uptime	10.6 Days
Run Date	Nov 24 '20 at 07:24
Run Duration	151 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	44%

PC Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X5660 6,950 User benchmarks, average bench 71% J1PR, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	58.2% Above average	Memory 84.3 1-Core 67.7 2-Core 130 58% 93.9 Pts	4-Core 175 8-Core 337 30% 256 Pts	64-Core 384 24% 384 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 58.2% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560 214,030 User benchmarks, average bench 79% EVGA(3842 4995) CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 457.30 Performing below potential (18^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	72.7% Very good	Lighting 91.3 Reflection 142 Parallax 89.5 74% 107 fps	MRender 92.8 Gravity 80.4 Splatting 82.7 70% 85.3 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 72.7% Great: 87%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139 63,520 User benchmarks, average bench 266% 22GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 702 Write 449 Mixed 416 115% 522 MB/s	4K Read 32.2 4K Write 59.5 4K Mixed 41.4 133% 44.4 MB/s	DQ Read 464 DQ Write 371 DQ Mixed 411 309% 415 MB/s
Poor: 159% Great: 353%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85 124,615 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 188GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 94 90 92 87 85 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	53% Above average	Read 94.8 Write 88.3 Mixed 63.3 SusWrite 89.6 62% 84 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.7 147% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 53% Great: 101%
Generic Flash Disk 126GB 514 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 77GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.5 7.6 7.4 7.4 7.3 7.4 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	5.02% Terrible	Read 17.8 Write 8 Mixed 6.7 SusWrite 7.4 12% 9.98 MB/s	4K Read 3.5 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 13% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.02% Great: 28%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3x8GB 7,706 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 3 of 4 slots used 24GB DIMM DDR3 Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	36.9% Below average	MC Read 12.3 MC Write 12.1 MC Mixed 14.9 37% 13.1 GB/s	SC Read 7 SC Write 6.9 SC Mixed 6.8 20% 6.9 GB/s	Latency 72.9 55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 36.9% Great: 73%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,243 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	2,022x
Core i7-2600Intel $195Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	1,566x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	932x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,139x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,040x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	821x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	455x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	424x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	516x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	376x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	297x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16