Asus X450LD

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.29% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (79%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 74% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAsus X450LD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X450LD
Memory4.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190419
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 27 '20 at 15:44
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User DOM-User
Background CPU 79%
CPU Throttled 74%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4500U-$393
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
51.8% Above average
Memory 73
1-Core 78.9
2-Core 130
57% 93.8 Pts
4-Core 174
8-Core 211
25% 192 Pts
64-Core 197
12% 197 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 820M
Asus(1043 227A) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.8873
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
4.29% Terrible
Lighting 6.4
Reflection 4.4
Parallax 0.1
5% 3.63 fps
MRender 4.7
Gravity 5.6
Splatting 0.1
2% 3.47 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.29%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 480GB (2018)-$69
222GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UG450000
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 367
Write 337
Mixed 258
71% 321 MB/s
4K Read 15
4K Write 31.2
4K Mixed 17
61% 21.1 MB/s
DQ Read 33.4
DQ Write 81.6
DQ Mixed 41.9
36% 52.3 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 60%
Seagate ST2000LM003 HN-M201RAD 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 2BC10001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,689
Write 21
Mixed 32.5
654% 914 MB/s
4K Read 387
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0
16,154% 129 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905428-155.A00LF Micron 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
42.4% Average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 13.1
42% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 14.6
SC Mixed 14.3
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 94.7
42% 94.7 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X450LD Builds (Compare 137 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X450LD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 40% - Below average Total price: $308
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback