Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 122%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 153%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics128% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive343% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE  (all builds)
Memory54.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201218
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 27 '20 at 09:03
Run Duration230 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X-$495
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
93% Outstanding
Memory 78.3
1-Core 152
2-Core 302
95% 178 Pts
4-Core 575
8-Core 1,160
102% 868 Pts
64-Core 2818
174% 2818 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 93%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
Gigabyte(1458 37A8) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
128% Outstanding
Lighting 172
Reflection 170
Parallax 174
140% 172 fps
MRender 186
Gravity 152
Splatting 126
123% 155 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 128%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Synology Storage 1.5TB
670GB free
Firmware: 4.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 93 92 94 93 93 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
25.3% Poor
Read 84
Write 79.3
Mixed 97
SusWrite 92.7
20% 88.2 MB/s
4K Read 11.6
4K Write 11.5
4K Mixed 12.2
39% 11.8 MB/s
DQ Read 98.6
DQ Write 79.5
DQ Mixed 91.9
68% 90 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 25.3%
Great: 25%
Amd-raid Array 1 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2519 1996 1668 2135 2162 2137 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
343% Outstanding
Read 3,107
Write 3,156
Mixed 1,554
SusWrite 2,103
556% 2,480 MB/s
4K Read 46.3
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 61.9
203% 69.9 MB/s
DQ Read 684
DQ Write 523
DQ Mixed 595
447% 600 MB/s
Poor: 88%
This bench: 343%
Great: 448%
Amd-raid Array 3 958GB
167GB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 648 310 143 114 172 185 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
74.2% Very good
Read 627
Write 1,026
Mixed 447
SusWrite 262
133% 591 MB/s
4K Read 11.7
4K Write 30.7
4K Mixed 15.5
54% 19.3 MB/s
DQ Read 151
DQ Write 592
DQ Mixed 62
138% 268 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 222%
Amd-raid KINGSTON SV300S3 480GB
375GB free
Firmware: 603A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 75 46 41 51 64 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
38.2% Below average
Read 322
Write 214
Mixed 263
SusWrite 68.9
48% 217 MB/s
4K Read 18.5
4K Write 15.3
4K Mixed 15.6
56% 16.5 MB/s
DQ Read 97.5
DQ Write 74.4
DQ Mixed 68.5
56% 80.1 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-3200C16-16GVK Kingston KHX3200C18D4/16G F4-3200C16-16GVK Kingston KHX3200C18D4/16G 64GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
106% Outstanding
MC Read 42.1
MC Write 37.6
MC Mixed 38.8
113% 39.5 GB/s
SC Read 25.2
SC Write 23.6
SC Mixed 36.8
82% 28.5 GB/s
Latency 83.8
48% 83.8 ns
Poor: 106%
This bench: 106%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS ELITE Builds (Compare 10,807 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 159%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 161%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $1,452
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback