Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 122%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 137%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics126% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive378% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE  (all builds)
Memory57.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200828
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 02 '20 at 07:51
Run Duration235 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
94.7% Outstanding
Memory 78.4
1-Core 151
2-Core 300
94% 176 Pts
4-Core 594
8-Core 1,109
102% 851 Pts
64-Core 2,113
131% 2,113 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 94.7%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
Gigabyte(1458 37A8) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
126% Outstanding
Lighting 172
Reflection 167
Parallax 175
140% 171 fps
MRender 185
Gravity 148
Splatting 105
115% 146 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 126%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Synology iSCSI Storage 1.5TB
809GB free
Firmware: 4.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 89 87 86 89 88 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
21% Poor
Read 97.7
Write 66
Mixed 95.2
SusWrite 87.6
20% 86.6 MB/s
4K Read 10.3
4K Write 9.6
4K Mixed 6.4
29% 8.77 MB/s
DQ Read 73.2
DQ Write 68.5
DQ Mixed 86.2
60% 76 MB/s
Amd-raid Array 1 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2669 2318 2482 2491 2410 2289 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
378% Outstanding
Read 3,524
Write 3330
Mixed 1,351
SusWrite 2,443
596% 2,662 MB/s
4K Read 44
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 61.9
200% 69.3 MB/s
DQ Read 616
DQ Write 505
DQ Mixed 536
408% 552 MB/s
Poor: 88%
This bench: 378%
Great: 448%
Amd-raid Array 3 958GB
205GB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 964 944 814 746 736 856 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 666
Write 719
Mixed 570
SusWrite 843
158% 700 MB/s
4K Read 12.4
4K Write 29.6
4K Mixed 15.5
54% 19.2 MB/s
DQ Read 132
DQ Write 520
DQ Mixed 61.3
124% 238 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 109%
Great: 222%
Amd-raid KINGSTON SV300S3 480GB
447GB free
Firmware: 603A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 208 184 176 171 192 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
48% Average
Read 343
Write 215
Mixed 268
SusWrite 190
57% 254 MB/s
4K Read 20.1
4K Write 16.2
4K Mixed 17.4
61% 17.9 MB/s
DQ Read 91.5
DQ Write 73.6
DQ Mixed 69.3
56% 78.1 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 48%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-3200C16-16GVK Kingston KHX3200C18D4/16G F4-3200C16-16GVK Kingston KHX3200C18D4/16G 64GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
107% Outstanding
MC Read 43.3
MC Write 37.3
MC Mixed 39.1
114% 39.9 GB/s
SC Read 26.1
SC Write 23
SC Mixed 37.7
83% 28.9 GB/s
Latency 83.5
48% 83.5 ns
Poor: 106%
This bench: 107%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS ELITE Builds (Compare 10,807 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 159%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 161%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $1,452
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback