ADD TO PC
BUILD

User System

Performance Results


Gaming 47% Yacht	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 41% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	52% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	120% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Razer Blade
Motherboard	Razer Razer
Memory	13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170110
Uptime	5.9 Days
Run Date	May 21 '17 at 00:45
Run Duration	132 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 473,208 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	80.5% Excellent	Memory 90.7 1-Core 117 2-Core 216 81% 141 Pts	4-Core 379 8-Core 604 60% 492 Pts	64-Core 586 36% 586 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 80.5% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile) 177,775 User benchmarks, average bench 47% Device(1A58 6755) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 22.21.13.8205 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	52% Above average	Lighting 63.8 Reflection 70 Parallax 52.4 52% 62.1 fps	MRender 68.3 Gravity 58.1 Splatting 64.1 52% 63.5 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 52% Great: 52%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLV256HCHP-00000 256GB 3,154 User benchmarks, average bench 121% 161GB free (System drive) Firmware: BXV7000Q Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	120% Outstanding	Read 1,437 Write 302 Mixed 460 158% 733 MB/s	4K Read 34.5 4K Write 122 4K Mixed 18.8 141% 58.5 MB/s	DQ Read 36.9 DQ Write 138 DQ Mixed 18 34% 64.3 MB/s
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 120% Great: 144%
Seagate USB 3.0 Cable 500GB 335 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 465GB free, PID 5030 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	24.6% Poor	Read 62.3 Write 62.4 Mixed 57.3 78% 60.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.42 4K Write 0.62 4K Mixed 0.25 31% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 24.6% Great: 47%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8ATF1G64HDZ-2G3B1 2x8GB 1,580 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	77.5% Very good	MC Read 27.5 MC Write 29.3 MC Mixed 24.6 78% 27.1 GB/s	SC Read 17.6 SC Write 32.5 SC Mixed 24.2 71% 24.8 GB/s	Latency 66.2 60% 66.2 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 77.5% Great: 77%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback