User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics42.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemRazer Blade
MotherboardRazer Razer
Memory13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170110
Uptime3 Days
Run DateFeb 28 '17 at 23:01
Run Duration87 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Memory 84.8
1-Core 113
2-Core 216
78% 138 Pts
4-Core 432
8-Core 602
65% 517 Pts
64-Core 601
37% 601 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Device(1A58 6755) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvd3dumx Ver. 21.21.13.7866
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.5% Average
Lighting 50.2
Reflection 60.6
Parallax 47
41% 52.6 fps
MRender 60.6
Gravity 48
Splatting 58.1
46% 55.6 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 52%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLV256HCHP-00000 256GB
168GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXV7000Q
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 1,351
Write 297
Mixed 467
152% 705 MB/s
4K Read 16.2
4K Write 63.4
4K Mixed 16.1
79% 31.9 MB/s
DQ Read 33.5
DQ Write 296
DQ Mixed 15.3
56% 115 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 103%
Great: 144%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HDZ-2G3B1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
76% Very good
MC Read 27.3
MC Write 28.3
MC Mixed 24.5
76% 26.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 31
SC Mixed 24.9
70% 24.4 GB/s
Latency 72.1
56% 72.1 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 76%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback