Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K5-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	8.77% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	45.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Gigabyte AX370-Gaming K5
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K5-CF (all builds)
Memory	14.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170407
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 19 '17 at 22:48
Run Duration	118 Seconds
Run User	SRB-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	71.7% Very good	Memory 70.9 1-Core 109 2-Core 187 70% 122 Pts	4-Core 389 8-Core 707 66% 548 Pts	64-Core 1,086 67% 1,086 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 71.7% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI HD 4870 22,563 User benchmarks, average bench 9% Sapphire(174B E810) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001 Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	8.77% Terrible	Lighting 11.2 Reflection 9.5 Parallax 8.16 9% 9.62 fps	MRender 7.86 Gravity 7.7 Splatting 12.7 8% 9.43 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 8.77% Great: 12%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V Series 128GB 244 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 81GB free (System drive) Firmware: E120506a Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (96^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 37146 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 396 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 1 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 200 200 0 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 48 48 210456543280 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	45.9% Average	Read 280 Write 201 Mixed 242 54% 241 MB/s	4K Read 17.7 4K Write 48.8 4K Mixed 13.9 70% 26.8 MB/s	DQ Read 17.8 DQ Write 47.5 DQ Mixed 13.9 16% 26.4 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 45.9% Great: 45%
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$24 56,540 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 52GB free Firmware: 05.06H05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 160 158 2958 (04) Start/Stop count 92 92 8010 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 3 3 71171 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1338 (C0) Power-off retract count 197 197 2432 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 197 197 10084 (C2) HDA temperature 103 92 40 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 8 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	35.5% Below average	Read 57.5 Write 65.8 Mixed 63.2 47% 62.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.64 4K Mixed 0.28 78% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 35.5% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$57 31,641 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (38^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	78.8% Very good	MC Read 30.6 MC Write 29 MC Mixed 26.4 82% 28.7 GB/s	SC Read 19.3 SC Write 28.1 SC Mixed 23.1 67% 23.5 GB/s	Latency 99.2 40% 99.2 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 78.8% Great: 107%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming K5-CF Builds (Compare 612 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 60%

Gunboat

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 58%

Gunboat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K5-CF

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	82x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	77x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	54x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	45x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	42x
GTX 1080Nvidia $245Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	41x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	22x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	16x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	13x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	31x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	18x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 94% - Outstanding

Total price: $455

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16