HP Pavilion 14 Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.01% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHP Pavilion 14 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 227D
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140804
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateDec 22 '20 at 22:05
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User ECU-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4510U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
59.4% Above average
Memory 84.4
1-Core 89.1
2-Core 146
65% 107 Pts
4-Core 202
8-Core 196
27% 199 Pts
64-Core 181
11% 181 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
HP(103C 227D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
1.01% Terrible
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 2.1
Parallax 4.9
0% 2.4 fps
MRender 3.7
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 3.7
3% 3.2 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.01%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 750GB-$125
662GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JA2OA710
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 78 70 60 48 80 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
30% Below average
Read 34.9
Write 88.4
Mixed 36.3
SusWrite 69.7
42% 57.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.4
70% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 30%
Great: 57%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 8GB
6GB free, PID 006f
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.9 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.1 3.2 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
1.33% Terrible
Read 4.5
Write 2.2
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 3.1
4% 3.07 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.33%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP691160-H63-KEB 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
29.1% Poor
MC Read 9.3
MC Write 9.8
MC Mixed 8.1
26% 9.07 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 9.6
27% 9.6 GB/s
Latency 72.8
55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion 14 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 583 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion 14 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback