TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus P8B75-M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics16.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemASUS P8B75-M
MotherboardAsus P8B75-M  (all builds)
Memory8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140806
Uptime3.9 Days
Run DateDec 22 '20 at 16:45
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3330
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
62% Good
Memory 88
1-Core 73.3
2-Core 144
62% 102 Pts
4-Core 208
8-Core 227
28% 217 Pts
64-Core 220
14% 220 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑
This bench: 62%
 Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Asus(1043 84BB)
CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
16.2% Very poor
Lighting 19.8
Reflection 17.3
Parallax 19.6
16% 18.9 fps
MRender 23.3
Gravity 22.2
Splatting 16
16% 20.5 fps
Poor: 16% ↑
This bench: 16.2%
 Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
2GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71E0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 184
Write 38.5
Mixed 48.8
19% 90.4 MB/s
4K Read 12.5
4K Write 17.2
4K Mixed 8.7
39% 12.8 MB/s
DQ Read 11.2
DQ Write 17.2
DQ Mixed 12.3
10% 13.6 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 85%
Seagate ST1000VM002-1CT162 1TB
74GB free
Firmware: SC11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 129 131 132 133 132 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
78.9% Very good
Read 145
Write 139
Mixed 53.5
SusWrite 130
85% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑
This bench: 78.9%
 Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5402-031.A00LF 99U5402-052.A00LF 99U5402-031.A00LF 99U5402-052.A00LF 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.5% Average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 14.7
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 13.3
SC Mixed 12.9
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 69.5
58% 69.5 ns
Poor: 47% ↑
This bench: 46.5%
 Great: 60%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical P8B75-M Builds (Compare 1,515 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8B75-M - $470

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel  $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples391x
Core i5-3470Intel  $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples206x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples133x
GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia  $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples103x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples97x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia  $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples89x
SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung  $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples64x
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples50x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung  $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples44x
RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples35x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples23x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GBKingstonBench 52%, 19,522 samples19x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $902
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback