MSI X99A GAMING 7 (MS-7885)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics48.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7885
MotherboardMSI X99A GAMING 7 (MS-7885)  (all builds)
Memory57.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160715
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateDec 22 '20 at 06:10
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6900K-$120
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
88% Excellent
Memory 91.6
1-Core 102
2-Core 200
76% 132 Pts
4-Core 454
8-Core 806
76% 630 Pts
64-Core 1,171
72% 1,171 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 88%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,198
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 457.30
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (60 fps cap detected)
48.5% Average
Lighting 59.5
Reflection 59.5
Parallax 59.5
48% 59.5 fps
MRender 59.4
Gravity 59.7
Splatting 59.1
49% 59.4 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199
541GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 350 328 328 334 335 331 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 434
Write 421
Mixed 367
SusWrite 334
88% 389 MB/s
4K Read 36.3
4K Write 84.8
4K Mixed 43.1
155% 54.7 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 262
222% 326 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 102%
Great: 126%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
610GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 354 375 368 376 375 381 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 442
Write 425
Mixed 428
SusWrite 372
94% 417 MB/s
4K Read 35.8
4K Write 91.2
4K Mixed 50.2
167% 59.1 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 284
233% 334 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 108%
Great: 133%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
515GB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 155 157 154 156 155 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
Read 174
Write 114
Mixed 79.2
SusWrite 155
96% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 114%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
121GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 91 91 91 95 94 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
50.4% Above average
Read 84
Write 81
Mixed 72
SusWrite 91.4
61% 82.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
179% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 85%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
762GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 126 127 126 128 124 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
90.3% Outstanding
Read 189
Write 186
Mixed 23.3
SusWrite 126
94% 131 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.6
155% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 90.3%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS16G4D240FSB.16FB BLS16G4D240FSC.16FB BLS16G4D240FSB.16FB BLS16G4D240FSC.16FB 64GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
117% Outstanding
MC Read 47.6
MC Write 51.3
MC Mixed 40.2
132% 46.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 17.3
SC Mixed 19.6
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 64.8
62% 64.8 ns
Poor: 113%
This bench: 117%
Great: 117%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99A GAMING 7 (MS-7885) Builds (Compare 707 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: MSI X99A GAMING 7 (MS-7885)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $419
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback