MSI H110M GAMING (MS-7994)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics45.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7994
MotherboardMSI H110M GAMING (MS-7994)  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170424
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 22 '20 at 00:52
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$60
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
71.8% Very good
Memory 76.9
1-Core 106
2-Core 208
73% 130 Pts
4-Core 380
8-Core 415
52% 398 Pts
64-Core 418
26% 418 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1172 MHz, MLim: 1900 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.11.2
Performing below potential (69th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
45.9% Average
Lighting 58.8
Reflection 58.9
Parallax 73.9
48% 63.9 fps
MRender 60.5
Gravity 57.5
Splatting 40.8
42% 52.9 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 250GB-$76
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41110WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 265 147 160 139 60 68 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
63.6% Good
Read 307
Write 416
Mixed 287
SusWrite 140
65% 287 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 66.2
4K Mixed 36.6
125% 43.7 MB/s
DQ Read 64.6
DQ Write 107
DQ Mixed 67
56% 79.6 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
660GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 159 159 158 158 161 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
93.3% Outstanding
Read 166
Write 130
Mixed 78.1
SusWrite 159
98% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 93.3%
Great: 114%
WD Blue 1TB (2015)-$50
796GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 120 122 123 121 121 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
67.2% Good
Read 113
Write 115
Mixed 75.3
SusWrite 121
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.9
192% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LED DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$192
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
70.1% Very good
MC Read 26.5
MC Write 28.4
MC Mixed 21.1
72% 25.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 25.6
SC Mixed 20.2
57% 20 GB/s
Latency 86.5
46% 86.5 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M GAMING (MS-7994) Builds (Compare 1,895 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI H110M GAMING (MS-7994)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $264
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $37
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback