MSI H110M GAMING (MS-7994)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics13.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive50.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7994
MotherboardMSI H110M GAMING (MS-7994)  (all builds)
Memory7.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170424
Uptime6.9 Days
Run DateDec 22 '20 at 00:20
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$60
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
78.4% Very good
Memory 87.5
1-Core 108
2-Core 211
78% 135 Pts
4-Core 400
8-Core 407
54% 404 Pts
64-Core 339
21% 339 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1112 MHz, MLim: 1900 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.11.2
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
13.7% Very poor
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 56.4
Parallax 71.1
0% 42.5 fps
MRender 58.4
Gravity 54.3
Splatting 38.6
40% 50.4 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 250GB-$76
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41110WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 90 72 74 53 73 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
50.7% Above average
Read 294
Write 249
Mixed 169
SusWrite 83.5
44% 199 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 60.2
4K Mixed 23.9
99% 36.1 MB/s
DQ Read 64.9
DQ Write 106
DQ Mixed 65
55% 78.8 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
660GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 158 155 154 148 156 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
91.1% Outstanding
Read 163
Write 136
Mixed 74.9
SusWrite 155
97% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
155% 1 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 91.1%
Great: 114%
WD Blue 1TB (2015)-$50
796GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 121 120 122 122 122 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
66.8% Good
Read 111
Write 108
Mixed 88.6
SusWrite 121
79% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.9
183% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LED DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$192
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
62.5% Good
MC Read 22.1
MC Write 24.2
MC Mixed 19.6
63% 22 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 22.8
SC Mixed 18.1
52% 18.3 GB/s
Latency 70
57% 70 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M GAMING (MS-7994) Builds (Compare 1,895 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI H110M GAMING (MS-7994)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $264
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback