Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 73% Battleship	Desktop 97% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 67% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	75.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	371% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191119
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 22 '20 at 00:16
Run Duration	264 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$86 1,072,639 User benchmarks, average bench 83% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	89% Excellent	Memory 82.3 1-Core 144 2-Core 283 92% 170 Pts	4-Core 515 8-Core 780 80% 647 Pts	64-Core 1,040 64% 1,040 Pts
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 89% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195 428,800 User benchmarks, average bench 71% Asus(1043 872A) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 442.74 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	75.2% Very good	Lighting 94.8 Reflection 90.9 Parallax 85.8 77% 90.5 fps	MRender 115 Gravity 81.7 Splatting 72.6 71% 89.7 fps
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 75.2% Great: 76%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93 455,997 User benchmarks, average bench 310% 673GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2501 2264 1582 1571 1565 1572 MB/s Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	371% Outstanding	Read 2,671 Write 2,563 Mixed 1,861 SusWrite 1,842 502% 2,234 MB/s	4K Read 67 4K Write 182 4K Mixed 95.2 320% 115 MB/s	DQ Read 1,259 DQ Write 1,088 DQ Mixed 1,177 881% 1,175 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑ This bench: 371% Great: 410%
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB 97,462 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 208GB free Firmware: 411030WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 343 259 255 254 253 249 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	97.6% Outstanding	Read 496 Write 442 Mixed 368 SusWrite 269 88% 394 MB/s	4K Read 38.1 4K Write 90.7 4K Mixed 48.9 168% 59.2 MB/s	DQ Read 219 DQ Write 186 DQ Mixed 199 150% 201 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 97.6% Great: 111%
WD Blue 750GB (2008)-$72 4,659 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 415GB free Firmware: 30.04G30 SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 33 33 34 34 33 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	31.8% Below average	Read 77.5 Write 31.4 Mixed 38.3 SusWrite 33.2 33% 45.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.6 107% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 31.8% Great: 52%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 327GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 115 117 117 118 117 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	54.2% Above average	Read 72.3 Write 68.7 Mixed 64.4 SusWrite 116 59% 80.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 148% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 54.2% Great: 83%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87 42,465 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 5.5TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 147 151 174 175 169 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	80.6% Excellent	Read 118 Write 142 Mixed 68.9 SusWrite 162 90% 123 MB/s	4K Read 2 4K Write 4.6 4K Mixed 0.9 268% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 80.6% Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87 42,465 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 476GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 81 71 87 88 86 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	52.8% Above average	Read 99.4 Write 140 Mixed 94.3 SusWrite 81.7 77% 104 MB/s	4K Read 7.6 4K Write 3.2 4K Mixed 0.7 454% 3.83 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 52.8% Great: 90%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00D8PB0 3TB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 32GB free, PID 2339 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 98 97 97 98 98 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	47% Average	Read 125 Write 128 Mixed 99 SusWrite 97.6 151% 112 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.9 116% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 47% Great: 47%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$36 287,720 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	88.5% Excellent	MC Read 35.3 MC Write 24 MC Mixed 35.2 90% 31.5 GB/s	SC Read 26.1 SC Write 23.8 SC Mixed 35.7 82% 28.5 GB/s	Latency 76.4 52% 76.4 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 88.5% Great: 109%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,879 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $185

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $200Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	1,312x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $120Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	876x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $180Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	839x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	575x
RTX 3080Nvidia $879Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	519x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	407x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	343x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	276x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $69Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	266x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	242x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 89,024 samples	143x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $60Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	142x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $1,018

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16