Dell OptiPlex 7010

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics27% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell OptiPlex 7010
MotherboardDell OptiPlex 7010  (all builds)
Memory1.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180628
Uptime2.7 Days
Run DateJan 18 '20 at 22:44
Run Duration252 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Memory 84.4
1-Core 94.1
2-Core 188
71% 122 Pts
4-Core 369
8-Core 359
49% 364 Pts
64-Core 369
23% 369 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
Asus(1043 847A) 2GB
CLim: 1228 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.87
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
27% Poor
Lighting 31.4
Reflection 29.1
Parallax 37.1
26% 32.5 fps
MRender 40.3
Gravity 37.7
Splatting 32.8
30% 36.9 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 27%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY SSD2SC120G1SA754D117-820 120GB
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: N0530A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 141 148 130 154 153 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
59% Above average
Read 485
Write 77
Mixed 207
SusWrite 138
50% 227 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 46.2
4K Mixed 27
92% 31.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1
DQ Write 116
DQ Mixed 1
18% 39.2 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 59%
Great: 83%
Seagate ST3750640NS 750GB-$38
240GB free
Firmware: 3.EEQ
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 71 70 72 70 71 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
33.1% Below average
Read 44.5
Write 44.7
Mixed 35.7
SusWrite 70.5
36% 48.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
116% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 42%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 4TB
424GB free
Firmware: 040B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 17 17 17 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
12.5% Very poor
Read 26
Write 23.3
Mixed 21.2
SusWrite 17
16% 21.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
129% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 99%
LaCie d2 quadra 500GB
74GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 38 38 38 38 38 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
18.3% Very poor
Read 36.7
Write 37.3
Mixed 30.7
SusWrite 37.6
48% 35.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
80% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 21%
Generic Mass-Storage 8GB
7GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.7 5.1 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
5.66% Terrible
Read 18
Write 5
Mixed 5
SusWrite 4.8
9% 8.2 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.2
33% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 5.66%
Great: 10%
ST1500DL 003-9VT16L 1.5TB
283GB free, PID 0c25
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 15 15 15 15 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
9.98% Terrible
Read 27.7
Write 22.2
Mixed 19.8
SusWrite 15.3
28% 21.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
54% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 9.98%
Great: 12%
WDC WD20 EZRX-00DC0B0 2TB
436GB free, PID 2339
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 21 22 22 22 22 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
16% Very poor
Read 32
Write 26.3
Mixed 23.5
SusWrite 21.8
34% 25.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
105% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16%
Great: 22%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00D8PB0 3TB
292GB free, PID 2339
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.6 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
12.1% Very poor
Read 31.7
Write 26.2
Mixed 24.5
SusWrite 2.7
27% 21.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
108% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 47%
HGST HUS 724040ALE640 4TB
390GB free, PID 2339
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
11.1% Very poor
Read 32.8
Write 27.3
Mixed 28
SusWrite 0.1
28% 22 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
95% 1.17 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Dark-1600 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
51.1% Above average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 16.4
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 15.7
43% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 72.8
55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OptiPlex 7010 Builds (Compare 11,704 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 7010

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback