Asrock X79 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics43.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive76.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X79 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140213
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 21 '20 at 04:58
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3930K-$280
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Memory 79.5
1-Core 100
2-Core 185
70% 121 Pts
4-Core 349
8-Core 581
57% 465 Pts
64-Core 593
37% 593 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1268 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.11.3
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43.6% Average
Lighting 54.1
Reflection 60
Parallax 83.2
44% 65.8 fps
MRender 59.1
Gravity 56.8
Splatting 43.7
43% 53.2 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$122
745GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 389 383 413 368 415 362 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
76.1% Very good
Read 465
Write 427
Mixed 391
SusWrite 388
94% 418 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 22.9
4K Mixed 26.2
81% 24.2 MB/s
DQ Read 316
DQ Write 52.4
DQ Mixed 134
111% 168 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$122
837GB free
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 220 230 205 231 226 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
56.1% Above average
Read 247
Write 232
Mixed 233
SusWrite 221
53% 234 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 22.7
4K Mixed 24.5
89% 25.7 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 42.7
DQ Mixed 108
83% 118 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 133%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$52
3.5TB free
Firmware: CC52
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 162 161 146 163 165 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
91.8% Outstanding
Read 163
Write 124
Mixed 84.2
SusWrite 157
97% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
136% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 91.8%
Great: 96%
USB 2.0 Flash Disk 4GB
4GB free, PID 2018
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.5 2 2 1.7 1.9 2 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
2.13% Terrible
Read 5.5
Write 0.5
Mixed 1.7
SusWrite 1.8
2% 2.38 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
15% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.13%
Great: 5%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingmax FLFG45F-D8KM9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.1% Average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 16.7
MC Mixed 16.1
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 10.7
35% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 81.4
49% 81.4 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 251 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock X79 Extreme4 - $290

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $818
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $95Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback