PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 43.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 76.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock X79 Extreme4 (all builds) |
Memory | 10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20140213 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Dec 21 '20 at 04:58 |
Run Duration | 169 Seconds |
Run User | AUS-User |
Background CPU | 5% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-3930K-$280
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
|
72.1%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1268 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.11.3
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
43.6%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$122
745GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 389 383 413 368 415 362 MB/s
|
76.1%
Very good
|
|||
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$122
837GB free
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 220 230 205 231 226 MB/s
|
56.1%
Above average
|
|||
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$52
3.5TB free
Firmware: CC52
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 162 161 146 163 165 MB/s
|
91.8%
Outstanding
|
|||
USB 2.0 Flash Disk 4GB
4GB free, PID 2018
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.5 2 2 1.7 1.9 2 MB/s
|
2.13%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingmax FLFG45F-D8KM9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
48.1%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-3820IntelBench 70%, 38,674 samples | 87x |
Core i7-3930KIntel $280Bench 74%, 33,172 samples | 51x |
Core i7-4820KIntel $110Bench 72%, 23,169 samples | 31x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 980Nvidia $500Bench 59%, 167,107 samples | 25x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 23x |
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples | 18x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 28% - Poor | Total price: $818 |