Asrock X79 Extreme4

Performance Results


Gaming 38% Jet ski	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 33% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	46.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	91.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X79 Extreme4 (all builds)
Memory	10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140213
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 06 '20 at 01:09
Run Duration	154 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3930K-$195 33,172 User benchmarks, average bench 74% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	75.2% Very good	Memory 81.2 1-Core 85.5 2-Core 198 69% 122 Pts	4-Core 373 8-Core 560 58% 466 Pts	64-Core 676 42% 676 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 75.2% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% MSI(1462 341B) CLim: 1268 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.10.1 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	46.6% Average	Lighting 57.2 Reflection 65.8 Parallax 72.9 47% 65.3 fps	MRender 64.3 Gravity 55.7 Splatting 53 47% 57.7 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 46.6% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 739GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 411 445 443 438 439 443 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	91.5% Outstanding	Read 464 Write 451 Mixed 421 SusWrite 436 100% 443 MB/s	4K Read 24.2 4K Write 54.8 4K Mixed 33.3 108% 37.4 MB/s	DQ Read 326 DQ Write 231 DQ Mixed 268 203% 275 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 91.5% Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 837GB free Firmware: 2B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 230 240 241 241 240 241 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	61% Good	Read 255 Write 242 Mixed 244 SusWrite 239 55% 245 MB/s	4K Read 23.5 4K Write 32.7 4K Mixed 27 88% 27.7 MB/s	DQ Read 204 DQ Write 192 DQ Mixed 197 148% 198 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 61% Great: 133%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$49 67,711 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 3.5TB free Firmware: CC52 SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 162 162 163 163 164 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	94.3% Outstanding	Read 167 Write 118 Mixed 75.7 SusWrite 162 96% 131 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 129% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 94.3% Great: 96%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingmax FLFG45F-D8KM9 2x8GB 73 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (28^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	47.2% Average	MC Read 18.5 MC Write 16.1 MC Mixed 15.5 48% 16.7 GB/s	SC Read 12.8 SC Write 12.7 SC Mixed 10.7 34% 12.1 GB/s	Latency 78.3 51% 78.3 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 47.2% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X79 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 251 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 44%

Speed boat

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock X79 Extreme4 - $290

CPU
Core i7-3820IntelBench 70%, 38,674 samples	87x
Core i7-3930KIntel $195Bench 74%, 33,172 samples	51x
Core i7-4820KIntel $110Bench 72%, 23,169 samples	31x

GPU
GTX 980Nvidia $500Bench 59%, 167,107 samples	25x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	23x
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples	18x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	15x
NVMe MZVPV256HDGL-00000 256GBSamsungBench 201%, 5,877 samples	10x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $85Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	9x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 4x4GBCorsairBench 52%, 780 samples	10x
BLS8G3D1609DS 2x8GBCrucialBench 43%, 2,652 samples	9x
Vengeance DDR3 2x8GBCorsairBench 44%, 2,237 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 28% - Poor

Total price: $818

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369