Asrock X79 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics46.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive77.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X79 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140213
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 26 '20 at 07:27
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3930K-$195
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
75.1% Very good
Memory 80.1
1-Core 97.6
2-Core 191
70% 123 Pts
4-Core 377
8-Core 588
60% 483 Pts
64-Core 706
44% 706 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1268 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.8.2
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
46.6% Average
Lighting 57.1
Reflection 65.3
Parallax 79.6
47% 67.3 fps
MRender 64.5
Gravity 55.7
Splatting 53.1
47% 57.7 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
807GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 401 401 386 407 376 407 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
77.1% Very good
Read 464
Write 420
Mixed 388
SusWrite 396
94% 417 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 29.9
4K Mixed 26.4
85% 26.6 MB/s
DQ Read 284
DQ Write 62.2
DQ Mixed 115
99% 154 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
837GB free
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 227 219 229 212 228 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
54.1% Above average
Read 254
Write 227
Mixed 236
SusWrite 224
53% 235 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 25.2
4K Mixed 23.9
79% 24.1 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 46.8
DQ Mixed 83.8
72% 111 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 133%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$49
3.5TB free
Firmware: CC52
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 161 156 164 151 165 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
93% Outstanding
Read 166
Write 126
Mixed 82.2
SusWrite 159
98% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 93%
Great: 96%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
863GB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 84 82 85 80 86 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
48.7% Average
Read 85.8
Write 87.3
Mixed 57.6
SusWrite 83.5
58% 78.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingmax FLFG45F-D8KM9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
49.3% Average
MC Read 19
MC Write 17
MC Mixed 16.5
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 13.7
SC Mixed 11.4
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 80.3
50% 80.3 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 251 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock X79 Extreme4 - $290

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $818
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback