Asus H97-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics35.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H97-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160226
Uptime8.9 Days
Run DateDec 21 '20 at 00:40
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690-$51
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Memory 91.4
1-Core 107
2-Core 224
80% 141 Pts
4-Core 450
8-Core 432
59% 441 Pts
64-Core 447
28% 447 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Gigabyte(1458 368F) 2GB
CLim: 1481 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
35.8% Below average
Lighting 46.1
Reflection 48
Parallax 41.5
38% 45.2 fps
MRender 37.6
Gravity 43.4
Splatting 37.6
32% 39.5 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer AS340 240GB
198GB free
Firmware: APE13PE0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 223 153 158 154 151 159 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
77.6% Very good
Read 379
Write 377
Mixed 312
SusWrite 166
69% 308 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 82.9
4K Mixed 31.4
127% 47.6 MB/s
DQ Read 294
DQ Write 319
DQ Mixed 204
182% 272 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 95%
Samsung 850 PRO 256GB
1TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 109 124 128 141 136 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 136
Write 152
Mixed 29
SusWrite 125
25% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
2% 0.77 MB/s
WD WD5000AACS-00ZUB0 500GB
232GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 282 271 273 270 270 264 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 447
Write 289
Mixed 250
SusWrite 272
232% 315 MB/s
4K Read 17.4
4K Write 94.9
4K Mixed 35.9
6,471% 49.4 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 279
DQ Mixed 225
2,360% 292 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 49%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
321GB free
Firmware: 18.01H18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 108 109 108 110 110 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
64.2% Good
Read 114
Write 110
Mixed 71.5
SusWrite 109
75% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 0420 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
59.5% Above average
MC Read 21.4
MC Write 22.3
MC Mixed 18.2
59% 20.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 19
SC Mixed 18.1
51% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 65.2
61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H97-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,935 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus H97-PLUS - $132

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $567
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback