Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 169%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 202%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics201% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive93.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE  (all builds)
Memory26.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201203
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 20 '20 at 13:40
Run Duration236 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 27%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Memory 62.4
1-Core 152
2-Core 302
90% 172 Pts
4-Core 604
8-Core 1,174
105% 889 Pts
64-Core 2,154
133% 2,154 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$910
Gigabyte(1458 4038) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2265 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
201% Outstanding
Lighting 295
Reflection 261
Parallax 321
240% 292 fps
MRender 316
Gravity 250
Splatting 182
197% 250 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 201%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 363 242 202 190 177 169 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
93.1% Outstanding
Read 476
Write 436
Mixed 353
SusWrite 224
83% 372 MB/s
4K Read 39
4K Write 80.4
4K Mixed 49.5
165% 56.3 MB/s
DQ Read 217
DQ Write 180
DQ Mixed 196
148% 198 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 93.1%
Great: 124%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
165GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 284 207 294 206 263 240 MB/s
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
37.1% Below average
Read 189
Write 93.8
Mixed 68
SusWrite 249
34% 150 MB/s
4K Read 13.8
4K Write 19.3
4K Mixed 10.8
45% 14.6 MB/s
DQ Read 14.6
DQ Write 15.7
DQ Mixed 14.4
11% 14.9 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 100%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1778 1260 1054 1293 1288 1036 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 54% Great: 134%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110
1.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 159 159 162 162 161 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
84.1% Excellent
Read 133
Write 138
Mixed 89
SusWrite 160
96% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1
198% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 100%
WD WD40EURX 4TB-$113
3TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 123 123 123 123 125 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
56.3% Above average
Read 73.2
Write 73.5
Mixed 45.2
SusWrite 123
58% 78.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-3000C15-8GVR F4-3000C15-8GVR F4-3000C15-8GVRB F4-3000C15-8GVRB 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
56.8% Above average
MC Read 22.6
MC Write 20.7
MC Mixed 19.2
60% 20.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 11.7
SC Mixed 20.5
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 121
33% 121 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 123%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS ELITE Builds (Compare 10,765 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 159%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 161%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $1,489
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback