Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	5.43% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	44.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7400-$70 234,266 User benchmarks, average bench 64% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	79% Very good	Memory 84.9 1-Core 105 2-Core 219 77% 136 Pts	4-Core 422 8-Core 422 56% 422 Pts	64-Core 431 27% 431 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 79% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake) 153,031 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 8694) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8935 Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	5.43% Terrible	Lighting 5.8 Reflection 7.2 Parallax 6.7 5% 6.57 fps	MRender 9 Gravity 5.7 Splatting 9.7 7% 8.13 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.43% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 126GB free (System drive) Firmware: 71B1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 21 48 45 44 6.9 MB/s Performing below potential (18^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	44.9% Average	Read 261 Write 102 Mixed 60.2 SusWrite 34.9 25% 115 MB/s	4K Read 30.4 4K Write 33.2 4K Mixed 18.9 88% 27.5 MB/s	DQ Read 234 DQ Write 41.9 DQ Mixed 67.9 68% 114 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 44.9% Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 621GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 157 158 153 156 157 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	90.6% Outstanding	Read 159 Write 114 Mixed 85.7 SusWrite 156 95% 129 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.8 161% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 90.6% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS4G4D240FSC.8FBD2 2x4GB 1,235 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	78.1% Very good	MC Read 28.4 MC Write 31.2 MC Mixed 23.5 79% 27.7 GB/s	SC Read 17.7 SC Write 31.5 SC Mixed 23.2 69% 24.1 GB/s	Latency 72 56% 72 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 78.1% Great: 92%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 37%

Jet ski

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 29%

Raft

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	133x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	96x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	46x

RAM
HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GBKingstonBench 40%, 46,352 samples	19x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	16x
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x4GBHyperX $67Bench 69%, 46,617 samples	16x

Value: 95% - Outstanding

Total price: $215