Gigabyte GA-Z370M D3H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 117%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 109%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics110% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive292% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemGigabyte Z370M D3H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z370M D3H-CF  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170906
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 17 '20 at 14:56
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$188
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 95.7
1-Core 150
2-Core 301
100% 182 Pts
4-Core 597
8-Core 992
97% 795 Pts
64-Core 1,193
74% 1,193 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 103%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2602 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Lighting 141
Reflection 151
Parallax 138
115% 143 fps
MRender 123
Gravity 146
Splatting 126
107% 132 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 110%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139
137GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1743 1833 1764 913 641 579 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
292% Outstanding
Read 2,213
Write 1,478
Mixed 729
SusWrite 1,245
315% 1,416 MB/s
4K Read 42.8
4K Write 170
4K Mixed 74.7
251% 96 MB/s
DQ Read 1,238
DQ Write 971
DQ Mixed 1012
782% 1,074 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 292%
Great: 353%
Crucial MTFDDAV512MBF-1AN15ABHA 512GB
52GB free
Firmware: M6T3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 403 417 415 398 396 384 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 395
Write 373
Mixed 312
SusWrite 402
84% 370 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 41.5
152% 60.2 MB/s
DQ Read 354
DQ Write 321
DQ Mixed 247
210% 307 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 102%
Great: 105%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$137
22GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 462
Write 430
Mixed 403
96% 432 MB/s
4K Read 44
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 63.7
211% 75.4 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 364
274% 366 MB/s
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
BRIX Gaming NV 8GB
7GB free, PID 4200
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.7 4.2 4.3 4.2 4.1 4.9 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
5.92% Terrible
Read 27.5
Write 22.8
Mixed 20.2
SusWrite 4.2
24% 18.7 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
16% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.92%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$39
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
98.7% Outstanding
MC Read 38.2
MC Write 39
MC Mixed 26.8
99% 34.7 GB/s
SC Read 21.4
SC Write 44.2
SC Mixed 29.8
91% 31.8 GB/s
Latency 54.9
73% 54.9 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 98.7%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z370M D3H-CF Builds (Compare 1,406 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z370M D3H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $395
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback