CDM P8Q77-M2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics87.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemCDM P8Q77-M2  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK P8Q77-M2
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130415
Uptime2.3 Days
Run DateDec 15 '20 at 14:00
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Memory 89.4
1-Core 96.9
2-Core 165
70% 117 Pts
4-Core 307
8-Core 380
44% 343 Pts
64-Core 431
27% 431 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
87.7% Excellent
Lighting 110
Reflection 181
Parallax 109
90% 134 fps
MRender 84.8
Gravity 113
Splatting 104
83% 101 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$56
7GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF400400
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 217
Write 204
Mixed 177
44% 200 MB/s
4K Read 14
4K Write 28.5
4K Mixed 12.8
53% 18.4 MB/s
DQ Read 107
DQ Write 82.8
DQ Mixed 34.9
42% 75 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 55%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
649GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 158 183 176 181 177 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 178
Write 123
Mixed 62.7
SusWrite 171
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.4
101% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 100%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905471-065.A00LF 99U5471-050.A00LF 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
53.2% Above average
MC Read 19.7
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 16.7
52% 18.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 15.3
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 68
59% 68 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Q77-M2 Builds (Compare 53 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: CDM P8Q77-M2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $485
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback