Asus PRIME X570-P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics96.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME X570-P  (all builds)
Memory19.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191108
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 13 '20 at 22:03
Run Duration250 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X-$285
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
83.3% Excellent
Memory 66.5
1-Core 147
2-Core 284
88% 166 Pts
4-Core 536
8-Core 832
84% 684 Pts
64-Core 1,308
81% 1,308 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
CLim: 2205 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 452.06
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
96.7% Outstanding
Lighting 118
Reflection 176
Parallax 198
96% 164 fps
MRender 146
Gravity 124
Splatting 98.6
98% 123 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 96.7%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$40
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,948
Write 1676
Mixed 1,341
368% 1,655 MB/s
4K Read 49.6
4K Write 148
4K Mixed 70.5
244% 89.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1012
DQ Write 990
DQ Mixed 1,071
785% 1,024 MB/s
Poor: 152% Great: 302%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
125GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 375 299 229 275 278 280 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
64.2% Good
Read 456
Write 368
Mixed 304
SusWrite 289
79% 354 MB/s
4K Read 34.6
4K Write 34.6
4K Mixed 6.8
80% 25.3 MB/s
DQ Read 217
DQ Write 65.8
DQ Mixed 28.4
50% 104 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 124%
WD WD100EMAZ-00WJTA0 10TB
4TB free
Firmware: 83.H0A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 159 162 133 158 162 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
89% Excellent
Read 154
Write 159
Mixed 89.7
SusWrite 154
102% 139 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 5.3
4K Mixed 1.3
309% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 89%
Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$32
69GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 65 67 56 67 68 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
46.1% Average
Read 96
Write 84.5
Mixed 53.8
SusWrite 64.5
55% 74.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 68%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA630 1TB
61GB free
Firmware: JP4OA41A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 112 115 95 116 115 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
58.4% Above average
Read 92.3
Write 95.5
Mixed 54.7
SusWrite 111
65% 88.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 76%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2016)-$112
3TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 86 79 73 87 91 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
74.8% Very good
Read 176
Write 145
Mixed 76.3
SusWrite 84.6
88% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
140% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
63.8% Good
MC Read 25.3
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 25.9
66% 23 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 17.2
SC Mixed 23.3
56% 19.6 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME X570-P Builds (Compare 7,998 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X570-P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $840
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback