HP EliteBook 840 G2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive36% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemHP EliteBook 840 G2  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2216
Memory8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150901
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateDec 10 '20 at 07:52
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU10%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5600U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
62.7% Good
Memory 89.1
1-Core 74.6
2-Core 151
64% 105 Pts
4-Core 211
8-Core 221
29% 216 Pts
64-Core 220
14% 220 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 63%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HS-SSD-E100 256GB
166GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0522A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 354 35 44 67 25 152 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
36% Below average
Read 385
Write 78.3
Mixed 339
SusWrite 113
51% 229 MB/s
4K Read 16.6
4K Write 12.4
4K Mixed 1.1
33% 10 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 11.1
DQ Mixed 1.2
28% 72.4 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 36%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GS6MFR8C-PB Elpida EBJ81UG8EFU0-GN-F 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
52.7% Above average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 21.4
MC Mixed 17
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 14.1
SC Mixed 10.8
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 68.4
58% 68.4 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 840 G2 Builds (Compare 260 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 840 G2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback