MSI B450M BAZOOKA MAX WIFI (MS-7C87)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (94th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 6 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive265% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C87
MotherboardMSI B450M BAZOOKA MAX WIFI (MS-7C87)  (all builds)
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.5 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200616
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 07 '20 at 21:12
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$78
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
91.9% Outstanding
Memory 84.4
1-Core 149
2-Core 299
96% 177 Pts
4-Core 534
8-Core 877
86% 705 Pts
64-Core 1,103
68% 1,103 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 92%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$149
796GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1413 756 881 822 841 833 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
265% Outstanding
Read 1,593
Write 1,386
Mixed 1,422
SusWrite 924
299% 1,331 MB/s
4K Read 54.8
4K Write 199
4K Mixed 84
296% 113 MB/s
DQ Read 1,321
DQ Write 1,098
DQ Mixed 1,218
910% 1,212 MB/s
Poor: 164%
This bench: 265%
Great: 276%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BL16G32C16U4B.M16FE 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3466 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
69.2% Good
MC Read 25.4
MC Write 22.5
MC Mixed 23
68% 23.6 GB/s
SC Read 24.2
SC Write 25.9
SC Mixed 24.2
71% 24.8 GB/s
Latency 72.9
55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450M BAZOOKA MAX WIFI (MS-7C87) Builds (Compare 1,421 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI B450M BAZOOKA MAX WIFI (MS-7C87)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $516
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback