ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP HPE-310be

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, SSD, RAM
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics	4.7% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP HPE-310be (all builds)
Motherboard	MSI 2A9C
Memory	4 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100519
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 01 '15 at 20:27
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	52%

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 650-$70 42,063 User benchmarks, average bench 46% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 79.5 2-Core 135 50% 107 Pts	4-Core 238 8-Core 243 32% 240 Pts	64-Core 220 14% 220 Pts
Poor: 33% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5570 12,172 User benchmarks, average bench 4% HP(103C 6870) 2GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004 Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	4.7% Terrible	Lighting 6.1 Reflection 6.65 Parallax 5.09 5% 5.95 fps	MRender 5.48 Gravity 4.4 Splatting 5.35 4% 5.07 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.7% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 728GB free (System drive) Firmware: HP35 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 118 99 183935588 (03) Spinup time 94 94 0 (04) Start/Stop count 79 79 21555 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 18 (07) Seek error rate 86 60 407003739 (09) Power-on hours count 87 87 11618 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 90 90 10702 (B4) Unknown 100 100 4278389625 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 4295032850 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 57 588840995 (C2) HDA temperature 35 43 64424509475 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 44 30 183935588 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 18 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	57.3% Above average	Read 116 Write 83.2 Mixed 97 74% 98.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.55 4K Write 1.36 4K Mixed 0.55 109% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 57.3% Great: 68%
ST925032 0AS 250GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 101GB free, PID 0470 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	13.6% Very poor	Read 28.8 Write 28.5 Mixed 9.94 27% 22.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.42 4K Write 1.03 4K Mixed 0.33 48% 0.59 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 13.6% Great: 18%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback