Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics45.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive166% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX505DT
Memory3.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200922
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateDec 07 '20 at 11:57
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
66.7% Good
Memory 70.7
1-Core 105
2-Core 198
70% 125 Pts
4-Core 338
8-Core 561
55% 449 Pts
64-Core 561
35% 561 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 109F) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.20.36.03
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
45.8% Average
Lighting 59.8
Reflection 63.8
Parallax 52.8
49% 58.8 fps
MRender 42.4
Gravity 52.6
Splatting 50.4
40% 48.5 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_2200V_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GB
193GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P1MA0V4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 799 977 986 859 720 428 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
166% Outstanding
Read 1,072
Write 990
Mixed 986
SusWrite 795
216% 961 MB/s
4K Read 38.4
4K Write 65.7
4K Mixed 47.1
153% 50.4 MB/s
DQ Read 464
DQ Write 759
DQ Mixed 637
475% 620 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 166%
Great: 181%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$50
100GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 287 403 422 420 403 334 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Read 484
Write 375
Mixed 322
SusWrite 378
88% 390 MB/s
4K Read 22.7
4K Write 72.2
4K Mixed 32.9
115% 42.6 MB/s
DQ Read 237
DQ Write 223
DQ Mixed 191
154% 217 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC 12GB
2667, 2400 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
58.7% Above average
MC Read 22.5
MC Write 20.7
MC Mixed 18.7
59% 20.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 21.1
SC Mixed 19
55% 19.3 GB/s
Latency 99.8
40% 99.8 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT Builds (Compare 2,839 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback