Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics43.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (69%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX505DT
Memory3.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200922
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 04 '20 at 20:00
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU 69%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
32.7% Below average
Memory 28.5
1-Core 60.8
2-Core 94.1
34% 61.1 Pts
4-Core 198
8-Core 328
32% 263 Pts
64-Core 270
17% 270 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 109F) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.20.36.03
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43.4% Average
Lighting 56.2
Reflection 61.2
Parallax 49.9
46% 55.8 fps
MRender 47.4
Gravity 48.5
Splatting 46.3
39% 47.4 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_2200V_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GB
187GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P1MA0V4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 318 355 379 380 367 342 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
57.4% Above average
Read 351
Write 418
Mixed 332
SusWrite 357
82% 364 MB/s
4K Read 10.1
4K Write 14.1
4K Mixed 11.2
37% 11.8 MB/s
DQ Read 230
DQ Write 222
DQ Mixed 182
149% 211 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 181%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$50
103GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 180 189 195 193 189 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38% Below average
Read 213
Write 186
Mixed 190
SusWrite 185
44% 193 MB/s
4K Read 7.7
4K Write 13.8
4K Mixed 11.1
33% 10.9 MB/s
DQ Read 183
DQ Write 164
DQ Mixed 162
125% 170 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 38%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC 12GB
2667, 2400 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
36.7% Below average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 13
MC Mixed 15.5
42% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 4.6
SC Write 7.4
SC Mixed 5.6
17% 5.87 GB/s
Latency 263
15% 263 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT Builds (Compare 2,839 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback