Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics48.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive128% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX505DT
Memory5.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200922
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 27 '20 at 09:49
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
53.2% Above average
Memory 53.4
1-Core 41.2
2-Core 78.3
36% 57.6 Pts
4-Core 284
8-Core 558
50% 421 Pts
64-Core 558
34% 558 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 109F) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.20.36.03
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
48.5% Average
Lighting 62.4
Reflection 67.7
Parallax 56.4
51% 62.2 fps
MRender 52.2
Gravity 54.7
Splatting 53.4
44% 53.4 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_2200V_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GB
168GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P1MA0V4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 794 849 906 581 528 421 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
128% Outstanding
Read 911
Write 925
Mixed 813
SusWrite 680
187% 832 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 36.4
4K Mixed 26.2
93% 29.8 MB/s
DQ Read 425
DQ Write 520
DQ Mixed 586
410% 510 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 128%
Great: 181%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$50
219GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 329 340 367 372 392 385 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
75.9% Very good
Read 395
Write 363
Mixed 354
SusWrite 364
83% 369 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 36.4
4K Mixed 27.7
87% 28.5 MB/s
DQ Read 238
DQ Write 230
DQ Mixed 214
166% 227 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC 12GB
2667, 2400 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
61% Good
MC Read 24.8
MC Write 23.5
MC Mixed 20.2
65% 22.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 15.2
45% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 149
27% 149 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 61%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT Builds (Compare 2,839 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback