Zoostorm 7200-5295B

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics48.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemZoostorm 7200-5295B  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK H110M-R
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190703
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 06 '20 at 13:32
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 55%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$74
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
66.2% Good
Memory 80
1-Core 82.7
2-Core 174
65% 112 Pts
4-Core 300
8-Core 325
41% 313 Pts
64-Core 329
20% 329 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (60 fps cap detected)
48.3% Average
Lighting 58.9
Reflection 59.7
Parallax 59.7
48% 59.4 fps
MRender 59.6
Gravity 59.7
Splatting 59.7
49% 59.7 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7PD128HCFV-000H1 128GB
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM01H0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 130 141 155 141 124 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
72.4% Very good
Read 429
Write 305
Mixed 232
SusWrite 138
61% 276 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 68
4K Mixed 31.1
115% 41.7 MB/s
DQ Read 353
DQ Write 158
DQ Mixed 137
133% 216 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 107%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$74
832GB free
Firmware: M3CR033
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 165 157 185 206 336 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
55.5% Above average
Read 260
Write 246
Mixed 234
SusWrite 204
53% 236 MB/s
4K Read 11.6
4K Write 40.1
4K Mixed 23.1
68% 24.9 MB/s
DQ Read 216
DQ Write 277
DQ Mixed 235
181% 243 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 125%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
440GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 89 94 92 89 93 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
45.1% Average
Read 64.8
Write 63.1
Mixed 64.6
SusWrite 91.9
53% 71.1 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
199% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFD8213.C16FBD1 CT8G4DFD8213.C16FDD2 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
67.7% Good
MC Read 23.8
MC Write 26.4
MC Mixed 23.5
70% 24.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 23.3
SC Mixed 17.8
52% 18.1 GB/s
Latency 80.6
50% 80.6 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 7200-5295B Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski

System: Zoostorm 7200-5295B

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $259
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback