Zoostorm 7200-5295B

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics48.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive95.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemZoostorm 7200-5295B  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK H110M-R
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190703
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 06 '20 at 14:11
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$79
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
77% Very good
Memory 85.7
1-Core 105
2-Core 209
76% 133 Pts
4-Core 397
8-Core 382
52% 390 Pts
64-Core 391
24% 391 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 77%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (60 fps cap detected)
48.2% Average
Lighting 58.7
Reflection 59.7
Parallax 59.5
48% 59.3 fps
MRender 59.7
Gravity 59.5
Splatting 59.6
49% 59.6 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7PD128HCFV-000H1 128GB
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM01H0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 375 427 416 254 256 351 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
95.4% Outstanding
Read 442
Write 293
Mixed 230
SusWrite 347
73% 328 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 96.1
4K Mixed 39
149% 55.6 MB/s
DQ Read 356
DQ Write 135
DQ Mixed 128
126% 206 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 95.4%
Great: 107%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$84
691GB free
Firmware: M3CR033
SusWrite @10s intervals: 355 382 354 392 397 395 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
96.5% Outstanding
Read 448
Write 372
Mixed 330
SusWrite 379
86% 382 MB/s
4K Read 21.6
4K Write 97.7
4K Mixed 39.1
135% 52.8 MB/s
DQ Read 315
DQ Write 296
DQ Mixed 254
204% 288 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 96.5%
Great: 125%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
615GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 157 158 159 157 158 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 191
Write 146
Mixed 110
SusWrite 157
111% 151 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
220% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 100%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFD8213.C16FBD1 CT8G4DFD8213.C16FDD2 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
77.8% Very good
MC Read 28.3
MC Write 30
MC Mixed 25.9
80% 28.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 29.2
SC Mixed 20.9
62% 21.8 GB/s
Latency 71.4
56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 7200-5295B Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski

System: Zoostorm 7200-5295B

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $402
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback