Samsung 700C6A

Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	17.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	163% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Samsung 700C6A (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG DP700C6A-A01US
Memory	5.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170510
Uptime	10 Days
Run Date	Dec 06 '20 at 07:59
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700-$170 282,363 User benchmarks, average bench 72% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	72.5% Very good	Memory 75.8 1-Core 103 2-Core 196 71% 125 Pts	4-Core 372 8-Core 580 59% 476 Pts	64-Core 514 32% 514 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 72.5% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 460 Graphics 6 User benchmarks, average bench 19% Sanyo(144D C139) 2GB CLim: 1053 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 16.6 Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	17.4% Very poor	Lighting 20.9 Reflection 25.2 Parallax 30.1 17% 25.4 fps	MRender 22.9 Gravity 22.2 Splatting 21.7 18% 22.3 fps
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 17.4% Great: 20%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB 99,566 User benchmarks, average bench 177% 48GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXB70K1Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 343 150 144 132 133 132 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	163% Outstanding	Read 1,095 Write 800 Mixed 655 SusWrite 172 151% 680 MB/s	4K Read 48.6 4K Write 110 4K Mixed 64 214% 74.2 MB/s	DQ Read 1,031 DQ Write 871 DQ Mixed 895 686% 932 MB/s
Poor: 106% ↑ This bench: 163% Great: 236%
TOSHIBA MQ01ABD100 1TB 21 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 78GB free, PID 0735 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 66 65 65 66 65 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	23.5% Poor	Read 57.2 Write 71.8 Mixed 22.3 SusWrite 65.2 74% 54.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.4 26% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 23.5% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43BB0-CPB 2x8GB 14,350 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	53.6% Above average	MC Read 21.5 MC Write 19.6 MC Mixed 18.2 56% 19.8 GB/s	SC Read 10.3 SC Write 11.4 SC Mixed 14.3 34% 12 GB/s	Latency 88.6 45% 88.6 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 53.6% Great: 73%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 700C6A Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 19%

Surfboard

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

System: Samsung 700C6A

CPU
Core i5-6400Intel $67Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	2x
Core i7-6700Intel $170Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon RX 560-BAMDBench 20%, 49,289 samples	1x
Radeon RX 460 GraphicsAMDBench 19%, 6 samples	1x
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	1x

SSD
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	2x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 177%, 99,566 samples	1x

RAM
M471A1K43BB0-CPB 2x8GBSamsungBench 66%, 14,350 samples	1x
9905663-007.A00G 2x16GBKingstonBench 75%, 386 samples	1x
9905663-007.A00G 1x16GBKingstonBench 41%, 295 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 95% - Outstanding

Total price: $157

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16