Samsung 700C6A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics17.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemSamsung 700C6A  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG DP700C6A-A01US
Memory5.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170510
Uptime10 Days
Run DateDec 06 '20 at 07:50
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
71.5% Very good
Memory 79.9
1-Core 98.3
2-Core 182
70% 120 Pts
4-Core 340
8-Core 564
55% 452 Pts
64-Core 578
36% 578 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 460 Graphics
Sanyo(144D C139) 2GB
CLim: 1053 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 16.6
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
17.4% Very poor
Lighting 20.8
Reflection 25.1
Parallax 30.1
17% 25.3 fps
MRender 22.9
Gravity 22.1
Splatting 21.7
18% 22.2 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 20%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXB70K1Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 984
Write 838
Mixed 637
182% 820 MB/s
4K Read 39.9
4K Write 90.4
4K Mixed 53.5
177% 61.3 MB/s
DQ Read 946
DQ Write 808
DQ Mixed 819
630% 858 MB/s
Poor: 106% Great: 236%
TOSHIBA MQ01ABD100 1TB
78GB free, PID 0735
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 64 62 63 65 63 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
24.1% Poor
Read 64
Write 59.3
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 63.4
69% 52.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
26% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 24.1%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43BB0-CPB 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
51.6% Above average
MC Read 19.7
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 17.8
53% 18.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 15.3
SC Mixed 13.2
36% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 80.7
50% 80.7 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 700C6A Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Samsung 700C6A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $157
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback