Asus G11CB

Performance Results


Gaming 39% Jet ski	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 30% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	48.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	70.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Asus G11CB (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK G11CB
Memory	4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160204
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 05 '20 at 08:08
Run Duration	279 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6400-$69 171,457 User benchmarks, average bench 61% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	75.9% Very good	Memory 83.2 1-Core 100 2-Core 200 73% 128 Pts	4-Core 398 8-Core 386 53% 392 Pts	64-Core 388 24% 388 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 75.9% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Asus(1043 8664) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 451.67 Performing below potential (57^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	48.5% Average	Lighting 60.4 Reflection 66.7 Parallax 59.3 49% 62.1 fps	MRender 62.6 Gravity 60.3 Splatting 52.2 47% 58.4 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 48.5% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HFS128G32TND-N210A 128GB 4,377 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 56GB free (System drive) Firmware: 30200P10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 128 129 131 128 133 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	70.1% Very good	Read 430 Write 127 Mixed 151 SusWrite 128 46% 209 MB/s	4K Read 30.1 4K Write 80.1 4K Mixed 22.6 117% 44.3 MB/s	DQ Read 343 DQ Write 128 DQ Mixed 126 122% 199 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 70.1% Great: 75%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 269GB free Firmware: MS2OA7L0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 127 135 136 135 137 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	76.8% Very good	Read 135 Write 133 Mixed 30 SusWrite 133 78% 108 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 142% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 76.8% Great: 107%
Seagate M3 Portable 4TB 5,513 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 858GB free Firmware: 9300 SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 88 86 88 90 89 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	44.5% Average	Read 66.5 Write 57.4 Mixed 72.4 SusWrite 87.7 53% 71 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 3.8 4K Mixed 0.6 170% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 44.5% Great: 65%
TOSHIBA DT01ABA300 3TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 1TB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.1 5.8 5.8 5.9 5.8 5.8 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	13.4% Very poor	Read 40.5 Write 39.8 Mixed 35.8 SusWrite 5.9 39% 30.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.5 87% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13.4% Great: 60%
WD My Book 1230 5TB 1,107 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 57GB free, PID 1230 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.6 6.5 6.5 6.6 6.6 6.7 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	14.5% Very poor	Read 38.3 Write 34.2 Mixed 34.6 SusWrite 6.5 37% 28.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1 119% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 14.5% Great: 63%
ST2000DL 003-9VT166 2TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 379GB free, PID 0578 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 4.6 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	9.48% Terrible	Read 40.4 Write 37.2 Mixed 31.8 SusWrite 4.6 36% 28.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.6 50% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 9.48% Great: 51%
WD 20EARX External 2TB 28 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 208GB free, PID 1003 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 3.7 3.7 3.6 3.6 3.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	11% Very poor	Read 39.2 Write 37.6 Mixed 30.6 SusWrite 3.7 35% 27.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 74% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11% Great: 20%
WD Elements 2TB 35,768 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 524GB free, PID 1021 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.1 6 6 6 6 6.1 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	11.5% Very poor	Read 39 Write 36.9 Mixed 28.2 SusWrite 6 35% 27.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 71% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11.5% Great: 44%
WDC WD10 EACS-00D6B1 1TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 447GB free, PID 0715 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.9 5.4 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	12.4% Very poor	Read 36.6 Write 39.5 Mixed 25.2 SusWrite 5 34% 26.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.4% Great: 12%
WDC WD15 EADS-00S2B0 1.5TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 271GB free, PID 0578 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.2 6.2 6.2 6.3 6.2 6.3 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	11% Very poor	Read 39.8 Write 37.7 Mixed 30.4 SusWrite 6.2 36% 28.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.6 63% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11% Great: 11%
WDC WD20 EARX-00PASB0 2TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 87GB free, PID 0715 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.6 4.6 4.7 4.7 4.7 5 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	12.7% Very poor	Read 36.9 Write 31.1 Mixed 31.5 SusWrite 4.7 33% 26 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 95% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.7% Great: 13%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 1x8GB 16,202 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	42.3% Average	MC Read 14.7 MC Write 14.9 MC Mixed 12.7 40% 14.1 GB/s	SC Read 12.2 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 14.1 39% 13.7 GB/s	Latency 74.8 54% 74.8 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 42.3% Great: 43%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical G11CB Builds (Compare 509 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 37%

Jet ski

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 31%

Sail boat

System: Asus G11CB

CPU
Core i7-6700Intel $170Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	342x
Core i5-6400Intel $69Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	149x
Core i5-6500Intel $60Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	8x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	101x
GTX 950Nvidia $100Bench 26%, 111,509 samples	63x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	47x

SSD
HFS128G32MND-2200A 128GBBench 62%, 1,849 samples	87x
HFS256G32MND-2200A 256GBBench 70%, 3,087 samples	50x
SM951 AHCI PCIe M.2 256GBSamsung $223Bench 175%, 7,621 samples	11x

RAM
HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 1x8GBHynixBench 39%, 16,202 samples	82x
HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 2x8GBHynixBench 73%, 22,760 samples	78x
HMA451U6AFR8N-TF 2x4GBHynixBench 68%, 8,569 samples	26x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $370

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16