Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics11.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive79.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory19.4 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200107
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 04 '20 at 13:59
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G-$75
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
76.1% Very good
Memory 71.3
1-Core 117
2-Core 225
76% 138 Pts
4-Core 467
8-Core 466
62% 466 Pts
64-Core 465
29% 465 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
Asus(1043 876B) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.20
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
11.6% Very poor
Lighting 14.9
Reflection 13.5
Parallax 21.3
12% 16.6 fps
MRender 6.4
Gravity 16.8
Splatting 14
10% 12.4 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
268GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3Z40107
SusWrite @10s intervals: 325 64 222 106 28 95 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
79.6% Very good
Read 507
Write 441
Mixed 390
SusWrite 140
82% 369 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 28.1
132% 52.4 MB/s
DQ Read 166
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 45.5
94% 184 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 102%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 183 183 182 185 185 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 193
Write 151
Mixed 84.7
SusWrite 183
112% 153 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 108%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2400C15/16G Adata DDR4 2400 2OZ 24GB
2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.6% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 16.5
MC Mixed 15
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 16.6
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 98.3
41% 98.3 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,194 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $66

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $332
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback