Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 21% Surfboard	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 18.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.41% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	45.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E-450 APU 9,307 User benchmarks, average bench 26% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.65 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	18.3% Very poor	Memory 30.4 1-Core 19.6 2-Core 38.6 19% 29.5 Pts	4-Core 37.6 8-Core 39.4 5% 38.5 Pts	64-Core 39.8 2% 39.8 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 18.3% Great: 39%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6320 8,182 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 104C) 384MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0 Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	0.41% Terrible	Lighting 0.5 Reflection 1.2 Parallax 0.5 0% 0.73 fps	MRender 0.9 Gravity 0.3 Splatting 0.4 0% 0.53 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.41% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$28 142,801 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 171GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6CR013 SusWrite @10s intervals: 306 261 271 162 132 58 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	45.4% Average	Read 323 Write 243 Mixed 259 SusWrite 198 57% 256 MB/s	4K Read 11.2 4K Write 27.5 4K Mixed 16.8 53% 18.5 MB/s	DQ Read 89.1 DQ Write 76.9 DQ Mixed 47.1 45% 71 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 45.4% Great: 92%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown RMT3170EF68F9W1600 Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 8GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1600, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	10.4% Very poor	MC Read 3.8 MC Write 2.8 MC Mixed 4.1 10% 3.57 GB/s	SC Read 1.9 SC Write 2.1 SC Mixed 3.2 7% 2.4 GB/s	Latency 252 16% 252 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10.4% Great: 47%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 27%

Raft

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

SSD
TS120GSSD220S 120GBTranscendBench 70%, 8,401 samples	5x
INTENSO 128GBBench 65%, 3,345 samples	1x
SSD 120GBBench 68%, 22,748 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5773DH0-CH9 M471B5273DH0-CH9 6GBSamsungBench 36%, 2,424 samples	9x
HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 1x4GBHynixBench 24%, 8,698 samples	5x
EBJ40UG8BBU0-GN-F 1x4GBElpidaBench 26%, 5,316 samples	4x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16