Notebook N85_N87,HJ,HJ1,HK1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.22% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (81%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 60% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemNotebook N85_N87,HJ,HJ1,HK1  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook N85_N87,HJ,HJ1,HK1
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170508
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 03 '20 at 23:13
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 81%
CPU Throttled 60%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
50.5% Above average
Memory 71.6
1-Core 40.7
2-Core 72.5
41% 61.6 Pts
4-Core 160
8-Core 246
25% 203 Pts
64-Core 279
17% 279 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
Clevo(1558 850A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6374
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.22% Terrible
Lighting 1.3
Reflection 40.5
Parallax 1.5
1% 14.4 fps
MRender 2.1
Gravity 1.3
Splatting 2.1
2% 1.83 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 1.22%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
TRO-2280-500-PRO 500GB
213GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q1204B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 324 151 2.3 50 135 2.3 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
46.8% Average
Read 335
Write 237
Mixed 285
SusWrite 111
54% 242 MB/s
4K Read 14.5
4K Write 34.9
4K Mixed 15.4
60% 21.6 MB/s
DQ Read 90.3
DQ Write 282
DQ Mixed 23.8
65% 132 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 77%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
253GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1574 934 609 611 611 610 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
209% Outstanding
Read 2,208
Write 1,920
Mixed 1,347
SusWrite 825
352% 1,575 MB/s
4K Read 50.5
4K Write 85.5
4K Mixed 43
177% 59.7 MB/s
DQ Read 493
DQ Write 278
DQ Mixed 335
263% 369 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 209%
Great: 340%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFS824A.C8FBD1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
65.3% Good
MC Read 24.3
MC Write 26.8
MC Mixed 22.3
70% 24.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 14.9
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 97.8
41% 97.8 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N85_N87,HJ,HJ1,HK1 Builds (Compare 421 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Notebook N85_N87,HJ,HJ1,HK1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 22% - Poor Total price: $42
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback