Performance Results


Gaming 84% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 64% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	116% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	89.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$403 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	70.8% Very good	Memory 83.5 1-Core 149 2-Core 262 91% 165 Pts	4-Core 343 8-Core 304 44% 324 Pts	64-Core 343 21% 343 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 70.8% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Asus(1043 85E5) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 457.51 Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	116% Outstanding	Lighting 156 Reflection 175 Parallax 165 127% 165 fps	MRender 123 Gravity 156 Splatting 112 105% 130 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 116% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 250GB 26,055 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 49GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT21B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 239 180 163 162 158 155 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	89.1% Excellent	Read 494 Write 232 Mixed 240 SusWrite 176 63% 286 MB/s	4K Read 34.1 4K Write 95.3 4K Mixed 36.4 149% 55.3 MB/s	DQ Read 381 DQ Write 224 DQ Mixed 205 178% 270 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 89.1% Great: 126%
WDC WD40EFAX-68JH4N0 4TB 2,601 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 3.5TB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 172 171 173 170 172 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	22.9% Poor	Read 182 Write 174 Mixed 80.1 SusWrite 171 34% 152 MB/s	4K Read 6.8 4K Write 11.9 4K Mixed 1 18% 6.57 MB/s	DQ Read 1.1 DQ Write 10.7 DQ Mixed 1.4 2% 4.4 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 22.9% Great: 38%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$31 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 156GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 147 147 145 145 147 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	75.4% Very good	Read 117 Write 115 Mixed 83.4 SusWrite 146 85% 115 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1.1 221% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 75.4% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2A2400C14 859B CT8G4DFD824A.M16FB 029E CMK16GX4M2A2400C14 859B CT8G4DFD824A.M16FB 32GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	74.8% Very good	MC Read 24.9 MC Write 29 MC Mixed 25.8 76% 26.6 GB/s	SC Read 16.4 SC Write 30.6 SC Mixed 21.7 65% 22.9 GB/s	Latency 74.3 54% 74.3 ns
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 74.8% Great: 75%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 113%

UFO

Desktop 96%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 104%

UFO

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	2,426x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	2,343x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	2,151x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	1,222x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	1,047x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $96Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,002x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	1,986x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $37Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	1,459x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	966x

Value: 105% - Outstanding

Total price: $836

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16