ADD TO PC
BUILD

Hp-pavilion VT662AA-ABG p6395a

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	23.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Hp-pavilion VT662AA-ABG p6395a (all builds)
Motherboard	MSI IONA
Memory	7.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100303
Uptime	20.4 Days
Run Date	May 08 '17 at 11:43
Run Duration	276 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-750-$72 43,796 User benchmarks, average bench 62% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	69.3% Good	Memory 92.4 1-Core 78.8 2-Core 152 66% 108 Pts	4-Core 270 8-Core 270 36% 270 Pts	64-Core 270 17% 270 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 69.3% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 460-$90 64,240 User benchmarks, average bench 20% XFX(1682 9460) CLim: 1220 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 16.12.2 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	23.3% Poor	Lighting 27.5 Reflection 31 Parallax 32.3 22% 30.3 fps	MRender 29.3 Gravity 25.8 Splatting 34.8 25% 30 fps
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 23.3% Great: 22%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$65 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 88GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 3800 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 950 (B1) Unknown 99 99 10 (B3) Unknown 100 1 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 57 32 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 9 (F1) Unknown 99 99 8480449618
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 890GB free Firmware: JC4B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 111 99 30807990 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2360 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 83 60 212941742 (09) Power-on hours count 90 90 9317 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2325 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 30065229831 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 52 588578851 (C2) HDA temperature 35 48 64424509475 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 36 27 30807990 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -41979010335080 (F1) Unknown 100 253 3377260398 (F2) Unknown 100 253 2432679354	67.7% Good	Read 123 Write 113 Mixed 90.5 81% 109 MB/s	4K Read 0.78 4K Write 0.96 4K Mixed 0.58 115% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 67.7% Great: 68%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 866GB free Firmware: HP35 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 99 139083117 (03) Spinup time 95 95 0 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4801 (05) Reallocated sector count 99 99 68 (07) Seek error rate 83 60 223878495 (09) Power-on hours count 90 90 9536 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2394 (B4) Unknown 100 100 3858179631 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 34360262672 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 57 588513314 (C2) HDA temperature 34 43 55834574882 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 30 21 139083117 (C4) Reallocation count 99 99 68 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	64.7% Good	Read 113 Write 112 Mixed 93.6 80% 106 MB/s	4K Read 0.81 4K Write 1.48 4K Mixed 0.6 127% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 64.7% Great: 68%
HP Desktop HD BD07 2TB 451 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 2TB free, PID bd07 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	14.8% Very poor	Read 29.7 Write 23.6 Mixed 19.4 30% 24.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.72 4K Write 1.68 4K Mixed 0.21 67% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 14.8% Great: 46%
HP Desktop HD BD07 1TB 151 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 651GB free, PID bd07 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	13.6% Very poor	Read 24.1 Write 21.7 Mixed 23.2 29% 23 MB/s	4K Read 0.57 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.18 66% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13.6% Great: 46%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 9905458-026.A00LF 2C802C80 16JTF25664AZ-1G4F1 9801 9905458-026.A00LF 2C802C80 16JTF25664AZ-1G4F1 12GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	42.3% Average	MC Read 15.5 MC Write 12.7 MC Mixed 14.2 40% 14.1 GB/s	SC Read 12.4 SC Write 11.4 SC Mixed 12.4 34% 12.1 GB/s	Latency 63.3 63% 63.3 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 42.3% Great: 43%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.

Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?

PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.

Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?

Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...

Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?

Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback