Performance Results


Gaming 62% Destroyer	Desktop 101% UFO	Workstation 62% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	56.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	320% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	13 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201124
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 02 '20 at 02:40
Run Duration	203 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205 635,419 User benchmarks, average bench 86% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	97.3% Outstanding	Memory 82.6 1-Core 153 2-Core 304 97% 180 Pts	4-Core 600 8-Core 1,057 100% 829 Pts	64-Core 1,459 90% 1,459 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 97.3% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% XFX(1682 C570) CLim: 1463 MHz, MLim: 2010 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.11.2 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	56.5% Above average	Lighting 72.7 Reflection 67.5 Parallax 94.8 59% 78.3 fps	MRender 68.9 Gravity 72.9 Splatting 50.8 51% 64.2 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 56.5% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 264GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1482 665 659 664 650 660 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	320% Outstanding	Read 2,582 Write 2,338 Mixed 1,565 SusWrite 797 406% 1,821 MB/s	4K Read 71.8 4K Write 207 4K Mixed 101 347% 126 MB/s	DQ Read 1,428 DQ Write 1,311 DQ Mixed 1,345 1,016% 1,361 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑ This bench: 320% Great: 340%
Amd-raid CT500MX50 500GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 453GB free Firmware: M3CR SusWrite @10s intervals: 389 393 394 391 394 392 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	80.1% Excellent	Read 470 Write 396 Mixed 403 SusWrite 392 93% 415 MB/s	4K Read 21.9 4K Write 61.3 4K Mixed 27.5 101% 36.9 MB/s	DQ Read 95.7 DQ Write 186 DQ Mixed 122 98% 135 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 80.1% Great: 77%
Amd-raid SEAGATE ST3000NM 3TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 1.5TB free Firmware: NS00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 43 44 44 44 43 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	59.2% Above average	Read 163 Write 41 Mixed 42.7 SusWrite 43.6 53% 72.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.8 181% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 59.2% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB 44,547 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	91.3% Outstanding	MC Read 33 MC Write 28 MC Mixed 35.4 92% 32.1 GB/s	SC Read 28.2 SC Write 27.7 SC Mixed 38 89% 31.3 GB/s	Latency 75.9 53% 75.9 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 91.3% Great: 116%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	571x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	517x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	406x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	341x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	273x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	265x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	242x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 89,024 samples	142x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $55Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	141x

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $1,037

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16